Translated from the original French publication, this book provides a comprehensive analysis of twentieth-century Chinese literature and examines the relationship between Chinese literary theory and modernity. Jin Siyan surveys the work of leading writers including Zhang Ailing, Bei Dao, and Mu Dan. She seeks to answer some fundamental questions in the study of Chinese literary history, such as: How does contemporary Chinese literature go from historical narrative to the narrative of the I, where rhythm and epic merge into writing, and where the instinctive load of the rhythm substantiates the epic? What are the steps and the forms of mediation that allow such a transition? Is the subject the only agent of the transition? What is its status? What is the role of poetic language that led to the birth of the subject and which separates it from empiricism? What are the difficulties faced by Chinese writers today? Young Chinese writers set off in search of a totally new writing to rediscover subjectivity, which is in no way limited to literature; it also covers areas such as the law, and the expression of the I confronted with an overpowering we.
?
好評推薦
?
“This book provides a comprehensive and rigorous analysis of twentieth-century Chinese literature and the study of its subjectivity. With a research background that traverses East and West, Jin Siyan uses cross-cultural lenses to survey the relationship between contemporary Chinese literature and modernism and to show how subjective writing is presented. The author also gives an in-depth critical analysis of contemporary Chinese poetry and its historical trajectories.”─Yue Daiyun, Professor of Modern Chinese Literature and Comparative Literature, Beijing University
?
“The outstanding work of Jin Siyan deals with what lies at the heart of the revolution in contemporary Chinese literary creation: the emergence of subjectivity… These analyses of the different forms that personal literary consciousness takes, among contemporary Chinese authors, are as luminous as they are new. They certainly deserve to be widely known.”─Leon Vandermeersch, French correspondent of Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres