庫存狀況
「香港二樓書店」讓您 愛上二樓●愛上書
我的購物車 加入會員 會員中心 常見問題 首頁
「香港二樓書店」邁向第一華人書店
登入 客戶評價 whatsapp 常見問題 加入會員 會員專區 現貨書籍 現貨書籍 購物流程 運費計算 我的購物車 聯絡我們 返回首頁
香港二樓書店 > 今日好書推介
   
拒絕家庭意外！居家安全設計健檢100+：瓦斯•水電•防墜•防盜，讓家人遠離危險的保平安設計
拒絕家庭意外！居家安全設計健檢100+：瓦斯•水電•防墜•防盜，讓家人遠離危險的保平安設計
  • 定價93.00元
  • 8 折優惠：HK$74.4
    • 放入購物車
二樓書籍分類
 
漢語的派生構詞法
漢語的派生構詞法

沒有庫存
訂購需時10-14天
9789861475233
馬振國
文鶴出版
2012年3月01日
150.00  元
HK$ 127.5  

詳
細
資
料 		ISBN：9789861475233
  • 規格：平裝 / 226頁 / 17 x 23 x 1.4 cm / 普通級 / 單色印刷 / 初版
  • 出版地：台灣
    		•
    分
    類     		專業/教科書/政府出版品 > 外國語文類 > 語言學概論
    同
    類
    書
    推
    薦
    南島語言Ⅲ
    南島語言Ⅱ
    南島語言Ⅰ
    南島語言（Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ，全套三冊）
    理論語言學及應用語言學中的語料庫研究(英文版)
    其
    他
    讀
    者
    也
    買
    詩與禪(精)
    詩言志辨
    內
    容
    簡
    介


    　　In the Chinese language, morphologically complex words have been attested since the remote past of the language, including both stem-modifying processes and agglutination of morphemes, mostly lexical and free in the classical language (see Baxter & Sagart 1998). Chinese word-formation has received much attention in the literature in recent times, but most descriptions and theoretical work on the topicare focussed on compounding (see e.g. Packard 1998, 2000, Lin 2001, Ceccagno & Basciano 2009a-b), and it is still a matter of debate whether compounding and derivation are two distinct phenomena in Modern Mandarin Chinese (see, among others, Pan, Ye & Han 2004).

    ?

    　　In this monograph we intend to analyse Chinese word formation patterns which may be candidate to derivational status, according to the definition of such process of word formation which we find in the morphological literature (as e.g. Beard 1998, Naumann & Vogel 2000, Olsen 2000): they are patterns such as X—學 ‘the study of X’ (心理學xinlixue ‘psychology’) or X—性 the property of (being) X’( 重要性 zhongyaoxing ‘importance’). The characteristics of the morphemes around which those patterns are built which sets them close to derivational affixes are that they appear in a fixed position, seem to form new words productively and convey a different, “emptier” meaning than that of the corresponding lexical morph (see Ma 1995). The apparent phonological (and, needless to say, orthographical) identity between a “would-be affix” and its lexical counterpart (as, say, 學 used as a verb, ‘to study’) is not surprising, since grammaticalization without alteration in the sound shape of a morph is a characteristic feature of languages belonging to the East and South-East Asian area (Bisang 1996, 2004). Therefore, the notion of “affixoid”, coined to describe word formation elements in European languages which are bound but phonologically identical to a free form in the language (such as Dutch boer, meaning ‘farmer’ as a word and ‘dealer’ when used as a bound form), proves to be unnecessary for Chinese.



     
    目
    錄


    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………..……………………………………..V

    ABSTRACT ............................................................................................ VII

    LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... X

    LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................. XI

    LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................ XII

    PREFACE .............................................................................................XIII



    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: THE CHINESE LANGUAGE,

    DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............. 1

    1.1 ON THE SUBJECT OF OUR STUDY: MANDARIN CHINESE...................... 1

    1.1.1 What is ?Mandarin Chinese?? ....................................................... 1

    1.1.2 The Phonology of Standard Modern Mandarin ............................ 4

    1.1.3 Aspects of Mandarin Morphology and Syntax ............................. 5

    1.1.4 The Chinese Script ........................................................................ 9

    1.2 DERIVATION IN WORD FORMATION ................................................... 10

    1.2.1 Lexical Derivation ....................................................................... 14

    1.2.2 Derivation and Compounding: Delimiting the Borders ............. 17

    1.3 DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION ......................................... 32

    1.3.1 Lexical Derivation and Grammaticalization ............................... 34

    1.3.1.1 The ?Parameters of Grammaticalization? ........................... 39

    1.3.1.2 Grammaticalization and ?bleaching? .................................. 46

    1.3.1.3 Grammaticalization and lexicalization ............................... 59

    1.3.2 Grammaticalization in East and South-East Asian Languages .. 62

    1.3.2.1 Comparing ?Western? and ?Eastern? grammaticalization

    phenomena .................................................................................... 69

    1.3.2.1 Affixoids reconsidered ..................................................... 77



    CHAPTER 2 PREVIOUS TREATMENTS OF LEXICAL

    DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ..................................... 81

    2.1 SOME KEY NOTIONS OF MORPHOLOGY IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS .... 81

    2.1.1 The notion of ?morpheme? and related issues ............................. 81

    2.1.2 ?Root? vs. ?Affix?, ?Derivation? vs. ?Compounding? .................. 89

    2.2 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ................................ 96

    2.2.1 Overview ...................................................................................... 96

    2.2.2 Recent works.............................................................................. 101

    2.2.3 Summary .................................................................................... 112



    CHAPTER 3 DERIVATION OR COMPOUNDING? THE

    MANDARIN CASE .............................................................................. 113

    3.1 THE BOUNDARY BEYWEEN DERIVATION AND COMPOUNDING IN

    MODERN MANDARIN CHINESE ............................................................... 113

    3.1.1 Methodological Issues ............................................................... 113

    3.1.2 Our Sample ................................................................................ 114

    3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE ................................................................ 117

    3.2.1 Class Nouns in East and South-East Asian Languages ............ 117

    3.2.1.1 Some Remarks on the Role of Japanese on the Development

    of Chinese Word Formation ........................................................ 124

    3.2.1.2 Concluding Remarks on Class Nouns ............................... 136

    3.2.2 Some ?Newly-coined Affixes?: on Analogy and Productivity . 142

    3.2.3 ?Chinese? vs.?European? affixes? .............................................. 158

    3.2.4 Between Morphology and Syntax: ?者 –zh? and ?式 ?shi .... 167

    3.2.5 Two models for prefixation ....................................................... 184

    3.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUDING REMARKS ......................................... 200



    CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION .............................................................. 203

    4.1 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............ 203

    4.2 ?INNER? AND ?OUTER? FORCES DRIVING THE EVOLUTION OF CHINESE

    WORD FORMATION .................................................................................. 204

    4.3 LEXICAL DERIVATION AS A CROSS-LINGUISTICALLY VALID

    CATEGORY ............................................................................................... 206

    4.4 SUGGESTED AREAS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ................................. 207

    BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................. 210



    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 1.1 The parameters of grammaticalization (Lehmann 1995) ............ 39

    Table 2.1 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Dong X. 2004) ............ 86

    Table 2.2 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Packard 2000)............. 88

    Table 2.3 Affixes and affixoids in Pan, Ye & Han (2004) ......................... 97

    Table 3.1 Our sample ............................................................................... 116

    Table 3.2 The evolution of syllable structure in the history of Chinese .... 125

    Table 3.3 Complex nouns with 學 xue as the head in Masini (1993) and in

    NXCD (2005) ..................................................................... 134

    Table 3.4 Sample of words containing 吧 b? as the right-hand constituent

    (from Arcodia 2011) ........................................................... 146

    Table 3.5 Prefixes, prefixoids and related categories in nine sources (Xu &

    Cai 2007, Yang Y. 2007) .................................................... 186

    Table 4.1 Inflection, derivation and compounding: salient formal and

    semantic features ................................................................. 206

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure 3.1 The minimal syllable in Old Chinese (ca. 1000 BCE) and

    Middle Chinese (ca. 800 CE) ................................................ 127

    Figure 3.2 Radial network for 吧 b? ..................................................... 151
    書
    評

    其 他 著 作